Recent Comments by EDD - [Religion... It's the Opium of the People Channel] • Religion.VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control

I'm not gay, but as far as I'm concerned, gay works.

Besides, I also know of quite a few ladies that celebrate "a d--k up one's a-s". You should try it

And yes. Tolerance.

>> ^quantumushroom:
You say you're gay and gay works for you?

Then allow me to say a d--k up one's a-s is nothing to celebrate.

Tolerance.

written by EDD

| 16 hours 13 minutes 21 seconds ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The Lick Spot

ant, I never knew you were this naughty.
Video title? "The Lick Spot." What's in the thumbnail? A pussy.

written by EDD

| 16 hours 29 minutes 23 seconds ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Obama and McCain: What do we do about evil?

Obama: "We see evil all the time. We see evil in Darfur. We see evil, sadly, on the streets of our cities. We see evil in parents who viciously abuse their children. And I think it has to be confronted."

Fox News, 45 seconds later: "OBAMA: EVIL DOES EXIST We see it on the streets of our cities."

Talk about selective reporting. Yup, that's very fair and balanced.

written by EDD

| 16 hours 34 minutes 57 seconds ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Teen Wolf Extra Shows His Wang (9 secs)

What? This wasn't about the father humping his son?

written by EDD

| 17 hours 2 minutes 26 seconds ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Ron Paul Doesn't Believe In Evolution.

1. I never said Christians cannot/shouldn't be scientists and nor do I think so. I know several good scientists that are religious, and I respect them, even though they were indoctrinated as children and have since interpreted some of their experiences as proof of a deity. It is sad, and it all comes back to indoctrination, like I said previously. Now, supporters of ID, however, are a disgrace and they're undermining the whole concept of science. I think you'd agree that there is quite the correlation between religious fanatics and supporters of ID, wouldn't you? So it's no real surprise I assumed you might be one. I apologize for this assumption, and I'm happy you say you're not of the ID crowd.

2. I didn't attack your interests; just essentially said you should expand your knowledge in most fields - as should I and pretty much everyone. I just get annoyed when people talk about advanced sciences with great ignorance, misconstruing and making up facts on the spot, and that was what you did.

3. We are in agreement on science not making the claim of (ever) having the absolute truth; yet you seem to be one who believes this is possible via faith, that science has no truth to it at all and also, that making this claim is a good thing; this is where your logic and rationality fail. Anyone making the claim of absolute truth is wrong, and hence, it's a bad thing.

4. The mass of an atom isn't "the most simple thing in particle physics". It also isn't the smallest particle. Nor the one with least mass. It is also, in most common cases, a known, and I am at a loss how anyone could forgo this knowledge in their secondary education. Just because you lack basic knowledge in particle, no, basic, rudimentary physics, doesn't mean the scientific community does.

5. I won't argue semantics of 'fact' here. If you don't like the scientific definition, you can... well, do nothing about it. A discussion should be based on impartial principles, however, you attempt to impose your set of definitions and interpretations.

6. How is a METHOD true or false? Do you have any understanding of what a method is?

7. It appears your 'knowledge' of particle physics is drawn from http://www.videosift.com/video/Quantum-Physics-Double-Slit-Experiment-amazing-results. That's just sad, man. You should at least browse through Wikipedia before you engage in a discussion about these matters. We cannot as of yet see an electron or a photon - it has to be registered - interacted with, to determine which slit it goes through to carry this experiment out - hence the intrusion and the different results. The cool thing that baffles scientists is that it's the first time we've had a situation in which one cannot measure without interfering. That's it. That's the easy explanation. I don't think I should go into how the complementarity principle and wave-particle duality work.

8. In response to your request (you ignored mine) - here's 7 ideas from a 200 years ago that we hold true and still use today, quite in their original form, include:

Heliocentric theory.
Narrative history.
Electromagnetic induction.
Electrolysis.
Oxidation numbers.
Kinetic theory of gases.

and finally, a dessert - Evolution. It's occurrence has finally been proved in a lab experiment. Did you know that?

9. Please, don't just talk about it, do also look the Theory of Everything up. You actually think it's a theory that tries to describe everything - which is hilarious. I hate schooling other people and doing the internet's job, but you ought to know it is a theory that would explain the 4 known fundamental forces of our universe - gravity, electromagnetic force and strong and weak nuclear forces. That's it, doing that alone has proven to be difficult enough. There may be other forces required to explain any and all physical phenomena, which is what it's geared towards, but it won't in any way try to explain, for example, why kittens are cute or why you're arguing about that which you have little to none understanding of on the internet.

All in all, I apologize for my sometimes hostile tone; it's rather challenging for me to tolerate blatant ignorance. And you saying "It is impossible to prove something truth with science.", that's just plain wrong and illustrates just to what extent you misunderstand science and its methods.

Anyway, if you think it does not further true knowledge, then why the hell are you studying science, huh?

written by EDD

| 18 hours 16 minutes 17 seconds ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Best. Trailer. Ever.

*beg for great justice.

written by EDD

| 1 day 24 minutes ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Ron Paul Doesn't Believe In Evolution.

Oh, and thanks very much for promoting discussion, dft

written by EDD

| 1 day 26 minutes ago | CH